Dogs barking at the truth
January 31, 2008
![]()
I was recently accused of being cynical. Remembering something a former professor once said about not minding a comparison to these ancient philosophers, I decided to do a little research about what exactly I was being accused of.
The word “cynic” comes from the Greek kynikos, meaning “dog.” The Cynics were a group of philosophers who thought highly of dogs, fashioning themselves as “dogs barking at the truth.”
Actually, the name was likely a reference to their lifestyle: They scorned social custom, lived in poverty, and, like dogs, did things in public that most humans do in private. Legend has it that Diogenes of Sinope, one of the most famous Cynics, urinated on those who disagreed with him, and once, when asked to explain why he was masturbating in the Athenian Agora, replied “If only it was as easy to soothe my hunger by rubbing my belly.”
But whatever the reasons for the name, Diogenes didn’t mind being thought of as dog-like. He wasn’t that impressed with civilization and saw dogs as a worthy model for a way of life much simpler and more honest than that engaged in by human beings. And he was willing not to conform to a typical standard of living in order to call that standard into question.
So insofar as cynicism reflects the performance of actions that call into question the conventional wisdom, I can see why it might not be so bad to be thought cynical.

February 1, 2008 at 6:16 pm
This may be old news, but have you seen this???
http://www.heidihoerman.com/lissacalendar.html
I thought of you immediately – although, you are FAR more adorable than all the other guybrarians.
Hope you’re well!
xo
February 1, 2008 at 11:05 pm
but just “calling into question the conventional wisdom” isn’t in itself sufficient. Equally important is the method that one uses to question conventional wisdom. hence your dog philosophers, as I like to call them, are not particularly effective arbiters of change. shocking perhaps, certainly uncomfortable to be around. but not very effective.
February 2, 2008 at 7:48 pm
What, you don’t think urinating on your opponents is an effective way to get a point across?
February 8, 2008 at 9:00 pm
Effective and sounding a lot like something Caligula would pull. (You’re a librarian, look it up.)
I beg to differ with kd, though – philosophers (particularly those of the dog variety) do actually end up being agents of change, but it’s usually not the change one would expect. Roman history helps me out a bit here, too – the Empire fell in part because of the gluttony of its citizenry, spurred on by its philosophers and leaders (Caligula included).